34. Doctor (GP) Letter expressing concern over Covid Vaccine


We have a letter which is to be sent to G.P's all around the country expressing our concerns about the new Covid Vaccine which as we all know is not fully trialled yet and there are concerns about its safety and the way it has been rushed into place without adequate testing and trialling.  This letter is available if you would like to receive your GP's views on it plus it also helps to inform your GP of the expected adverse reactions, no compensation scheme available for damages and how whilst working under their Oath to protect health they feel they are negating their responsibilities towards their parents.  Simply copy and paste or download the pdf, put in your own details, name, address, GP name, surgery address, sign it and send to your GP - We at Helping Hands would be most interested in the feedback from the GP's, this letter is being sent around the country not just from this site.  I would be interested in hearing whether or not your GP gives you the common decency of a reply and if so, what they have to say.

**Remember to include your details in the relevant (Bracket) areas to personalise it**  *Please note this letter is available in a choice of downloadable formats to include Microsoft Doc., PDF or ODT below this letter.

 

Copy & Paste letter here:

             (Your Name)

          (Your Address) 

(Tel No. )

(Email address)


Dated: (Today's Date)


For the attention of Dr. (Doctor's Name)

 (Address of Surgery/Doctor's Practice)



Dear Dr (Doctor's Name)


I write to you as a concerned citizen with regards to the planned COVID (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine Programme. I would like to share some information with you that you may already be aware of. We are being informed by the UK Government that a vaccine is now “ready to go”, despite the fact that clinical trials have been running only a few months, and the pharmaceutical company openly admits that their trials are far from complete.


RUSHING THE VACCINE WITHOUT ADEQUATE TRIALS I have serious concerns regarding the speed at which this has happened, given that we were told this new virus was identified around one year ago. How has a vaccine been developed for a new virus and reached phase III of clinical trials within 1 year?  Clearly, it hasn't and this is unprecedented, vaccine development which would normally take between eight and ten years and this should prompt serious questioning. Please see the points below for some critical analysis of the current situation.


HUMAN MEDICINES REGULATIONS - CHANGES TO LEGISLATION Are you aware of the changes that were made to the Human Medicines Regulations in September this year after an Act of Legislation was quietly pushed through Parliament? 1. It allows for medicinal products (vaccines and drugs) that have not yet been licensed to be given to the public, bypassing the usual regulatory procedures that have been in place to maintain patient safety. 2. It allows for anyone to be trained to give vaccines (license or unlicensed), including those without any professional accountability, such as GP receptionists, army etc.. This acts to undermine professionally accountable doctors and nurses. 3. It removes all liability from pharmaceutical companies and vaccine/drug manufacturing companies, and anyone involved in the administration of a vaccine. The only comeback a patient would have in the event of suffering damage due to the covid vaccine, would normally to be able to make a claim via the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme https://www.gov.uk/vaccine-damage-payment, however the Covid vaccine is not covered under this scheme and so there is no compensation available in the event of vaccine damage of which the ADR's are expected to be very high and in some individuals very serious including risk to life.


EXPERIMENTAL VACCINES Two of the four proposed vaccines (the Moderna and Pfizer candidates) are mRNA vaccines, never before tried in humans designed to meddle with our own DNA. The rushed roll out of these is therefore effectively mass human experimentation. We are told that the first to receive the experimental vaccine will be the over 85's; these are likely to be people in care homes with varying degrees of cognitive impairment, many of whom are not able to give fully informed consent. Please consider the serious ethical implications here. Additionally the trial design and primary endpoints are very questionable, too large a topic to address here but I would urge you to research this for yourself.


EXPECTED HIGH VOLUME OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS TO COVID VACCINE Are you aware of the recent appeal by the MHRA for software to deal with an expected high volume of adverse drug reactions to the COVID vaccine? https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:506291-2020:TEXT:EN:HTML&src=0 "The MHRA urgently seeks an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs) and ensure that no details from the ADRs’ reaction text are missed". Does this raise any concerns for you or your medical colleagues?


PCR TEST The PCR test is being used to “diagnose” COVID-19 and in turn driving up falsely the number of “cases”. It functions by amplifying fragments of viral DNA, and if the test has a high cycle threshold it will identify harmless fragments which could be old viral genetic material. A high false positive rate is widely reported, indeed Dominic Raab reported on national news that only 7% of tests were true positives. Therefore significant amounts of people who test positive are not actually positive, and have been told to isolate unnecessarily. Do the following quotes from the UK Government document below raise any questions for you? https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/.../Understandin... “RT-PCR detects presence of viral genetic material in a sample but is not able to distinguish whether infectious virus is present.” “Ct (cycle threshold) values are not provided for all SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection methods. Some commercial RT-PCR techniques are closed 'black box' systems whereby the operator cannot observe the reaction in real-time and the result is interpreted by software into a qualitative non-interrogatable positive or negative result.”


CLINICAL NEED This virus currently has a 99.96% survival rate, and most "cases" are either asymptomatic or with mild to moderate symptoms. Based on this information, and the fact that there are reportedly effective and inexpensive treatments available, one must ask - where is the clinical need for a mass vaccination programme? It is reported that more than twice the yearly NHS budget (approx £120 billion) has been spent on COVID-19 so far this year. What is the justification for the diversion of such huge amounts of public money to this disease, and away from conditions with far higher mortality and morbidity rates? COVID-19 was 19th on the list of leading causes of death (see below) for September 2020, despite this the UK Government has continued to impose even stricter measures. https://www.ons.gov.uk/.../monthlymortality.. The purpose of this letter is to inform you of serious misgivings around GP's involvement with the COVID-19 situation and the COVID vaccine. So far we have seen very little opposition or concern voiced by our doctors. You are professionals in whom we trust with our health, and we expect you to advocate on our behalf in matters of such importance; it doesn't appear that many in your profession are openly questioning the facts.


I ask you to carefully consider all of the information in this letter. A response or acknowledgement will be appreciated.

Yours sincerely


(Your name)


Downloadable formats available below - Microsoft Doc, PDF or ODT:

I BUILT MY SITE FOR FREE USING